Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1161420200230010021
Journal of Medicinal Food
2020 Volume.23 No. 1 p.21 ~ p.28
A Snack Formulated with Ingredients to Slow Carbohydrate Digestion and Absorption Reduces the Glycemic Response in Humans: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Rebello Candida J.

Johnson William D.
Pan Yang
Larrivee Sandra
Zhang Dachuan
Nisbet Mark
Johnson Jodee
Chu Yi Fang
Greenway Frank L.
Abstract
This study compared the effect of a snack with ingredients to slow carbohydrate digestion (Test-snack) on postprandial blood glucose and insulin concentrations and subjective appetite ratings. We hypothesized that Test-snack would lower glucose and insulin responses and reduce appetite compared with a Control-snack. Overweight or obese subjects (n?=?17) completed a randomized crossover study. Glucose, insulin, and appetite ratings were measured before consuming each snack or white bread (Bread) and over a period of 4?h. Subjects received Test-snack, Control-snack, or Bread in random order at least a week apart. The a priori primary outcome was the glucose response, and the secondary outcomes were appetite ratings and insulin responses. Mixed effects statistical models were used to perform analysis of variance in terms of the area under curve (AUC) and at specific time points. The 2-h AUC for glucose was significantly lower with Test-snack compared to Control-snack and Bread (AUC and 95% confidence intervals: Test?=?2186.43 [1783.36?2589.51]; Control?=?3293.75 [2893.97?3693.54]; Bread?=?2800.28 [2405.79?3194.77] mg/dL ¡¤ min). Four-hour AUC for glucose, and insulin, followed a similar pattern except that Test-snack did not differ from Bread. The glucose concentrations peaked at 45?min under all three conditions, but Test-snack elicited a lower response than Control-snack and Bread (P?
KEYWORD
appetite, functional food, glucose, insulin, starch digestion
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
SCI(E) ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)